The Idolotry of Ideology:
Conservatism, Russell Kirk once said, is "the antithesis of ideology".
Ideology, representing much of what we historically find on that side of
the philosophical road known traditionally as the Left (which is not to
say there is no such thing as leftist philosophy) in the form of
organized bodies of ideas, concepts, doctrines and fundamental premises,
presents us with some substantial differences from what should be
properly termed, in the modern conservative sense, a political
philosophy.
Conservatism is not an overarching, explanatory template through which
one may discern the underlying or essential meaning of the human
condition, a settled trajectory to history, or in any sense, a teleology
of the human condition. It is not, like so much within the historic
Left, a secular alternative to traditional religion. Conservatism is a
general set of ideas, a way of perceiving the world and the human
condition, a certain habit and orientation of mind, and a psychological
approach to the world that attempts, as best it can, to blend a
realistic conception of the tragic/banal fallen world in which we live
with an open ended search for "the highest in us", as the late Truman G.
Madsen titled a book of his in the late 70s). As Kirk himself said of
it in The Politics of Prudence, it is "neither a religion nor an ideology, the body of opinion termed conservatism possesses no Holy Writ and no Das Kapital
to provide dogmata." It is "the negation of ideology: it is a state
of mind, a type of character, a way of looking at the civil social
order." It has ideals, but it accepts the limitations of humanness and
the human condition, and does not try to bring its ideals to fruition at
any cost simply because they would be desirable and because the world would be a better place with those ideals realized.
Conservatism avoids, and indeed is severely critical of what Dr. Thomas
Sowell has called "the vision of the Anointed" and "the search for
cosmic justice", both terms used in reference to the tendency of the
Left to seek the ultimate development and perfection of mankind and
society through political action, social engineering and enforced
societal collectivism.
For the historic Left, humans are destined for an inevitable progress
towards a utopian future in which all of mankind's fondest hopes and
dreams will be realized in a world of paradisaical human happiness and
abundance. The only thing keeping humanity from approaching this
utopian vision are institutional, or structural defects within society,
or ideologies, beliefs, and institutions (such as free market economics,
individual rights, the family,
marriage, traditional religion, western concepts of property, economic
competition, gender roles etc.) fundamental to the structure of society,
which, if eliminated, would clear the way to the realization of a the
desired heaven on earth.
Ideology tells us how such a future is to be realized; it provides, in
its core form, a simple yet dramatic explanation for the meaning of the
human condition, an explanatory framework for the course of history, and
an overall plan for the restructuring, reformation, transformation and
redemption of society through the principles of the ideology.
Ideologies, as they have existed, particularly in the 20th century,
offer simple, clear, dualistic grand narratives of a history of
oppression and victimization by a dominant "them" - a ruling class,
dominant group, or "power structure", the dynamics of which are
understood to be at the root of most if not all social and historical
phenomena. They are (primarily in their non-academic, popular forms),
simple, emotionally and psychologically charged, prescriptive templates
for social change and political activity.
Their prescriptiveness is always present in that what Marx called praxis
is always a part of an ideological explanation for any human phenomena.
Nothing that is ideological does not have relevance to political
action. All true ideological principle are embodied within and related
to the acquisition and wielding of political power.
Ideology looks at the world as it is (what Dr. Sowell calls the "tragic
vision") and feels alienation, despair and rage at the inequities,
disparate outcomes, tragedies, and vicissitudes of mortality, and is
fired by a passionate desire to right all of these wrongs.
Conservatism, as a political philosophy, sees the same world, and
desires to right as many of its wrongs as possible, but within the
framework of a realistic assessment of what is possible given the very
real and intrinsic verities of human nature and what in the gospel we
would understand as the inherent conditions of mortality, or the
Telestial sphere of existence, that are inextricably linked to our
eternal progression.
Ideology, as Kirk pointed out, is best understood as a Christian heresy
that attempts to do through secular, political means what religion
seeks to accomplish through the changing, renewal and reformation the
individual heart, one heart at a time. As W. Wesley McDonald points out
in his Russell Kirk and the Age of Ideology,
ideology is virtually synonymous with political fanaticism, and its
fundamental premise, that the world of mortality may be be "converted
into the Terrestrial paradise through the operation of positive law and
positive planning", is inconsistent with the fundamental premises of
western civilization and representative, liberal democracy. The
ideologue "immanentizes religious symbols and inverts religious
doctrines". As a religion of politics that attempts to fulfill all of
the fundamental needs that are the primary concern of religion, ideology
is always set against the existing order, whatever that may be, in a
perennial attitude of "revolution"; it is, until all of its demands are
met, in a permanent state of antagonism to the existing state of things,
and its cry is always overthrow, rebellion, and the dismantling and
destruction of the old order.
Ideology has little patience for human frailty and weakness, nor for
the core attributes of human nature (both mortal and, from a LDS
perspective, spiritual) and seeks the thorough transformation of human
character, many times in great, wrenching social upheavals that, it is
theorized, will "liberate" human beings from the "institutional" and
"systematic" oppressions that are the cause of the world's benighted
state.
The political philosophy of conservatism, on the other hand, while it
always seeks and desires progress and change for the better, also
realizes that compromises are necessary with the "veil of tears" in
which we find ourselves as well as with human nature as it is given
within that world, lest in attempting change and societal development,
greater, and perhaps far greater harm is done to the human condition
than was the case even taking into consideration all the prior evils
which it was desired be eliminated.
Conservatism is an imperfect human framework of interpretation and
understanding that, while it accepts and respects the existence of
eternal verities or "the permanent things", as Russell Kirk termed it,
does not attempt grand schemes of social reformation in their name, nor
to see all human beings as pegs to be fitted, by whatever means
necessary, into the ideological holes of the"better world" of wide eyed
academic theorists. Unlike ideology, conservative philosophy values the
freedom, liberty and individual agency of each human being, including
the freedom to fail, to sin, and to relinquish one's human dignity, if
one so chooses, more than it values freedom from sin and failure if this
is to be achieved through the imposed collective renunciation of
freedom itself.
Conservatism values slow, developmental, incremental change that
preserves valuable traditional societal structures, values, principles
and traditions, while eliminating the dross that accumulates or is left
over from prior ages. Leftist ideology seeks, either evolutionarily or
revolutionary, thorough the destruction and delegitimizing of the past
and present social order, establishment of a new social order in which
humans will be free from the shackles, limitations and restrictions of
all previous social, moral and economic conditions.
Conservatism is an intellectual pursuit; it is a philosophy grounded
and steeped in the joy of the exploration, discovery and articulation of
ideas. Its tools are critical thought, close, nuanced reasoning, the
cut, parry and thrust of civil, critical debate, the values and rigors
of classical liberal education, a sense of the tragedy and limitations
of the mortal world while retaining a belief in an overarching cosmic
purpose and meaning behind even its most wrenching complexities and
dilemmas, and a conviction that there are things in the universe above
and beyond man that it would be well for him to try to comprehend and
conform himself to, lest he "change the world", in his passion for
"liberation" and "freedom" and in his "vision" of a "better world" into a
hell within which the very purpose of the mortal probation would be
crushed and ground to powder, even if each and every grain of that
powder were equal with respect to one another in their crushing.
Leftism (or its shadow, modern "liberalism") seeks to overcome the
effects of the Fall, not in the way in which the Book of Mormon and the
New Testament make clear is the only way in which this can be achieved,
but through politics and through various ideologies that tell of a
golden age in the past (pre-capitalist, agrarian society in which
workers were not alienated from their work, ancient pagan societies who
worshiped female deities and accorded woman higher social status,
ancient Egypt, where black Africans had achieved amazing feats of
technology, science and political organization, primitive "indigenous
peoples" who lived in harmony, balance and unity with the environment
etc.) that was uprooted and destroyed, always by western peoples and
values ("capitalism", modern technology, classical liberal political
ideas, "the patriarchy", the Protestant work ethic, the right of private
property, inalienable rights etc.) and which a messianic ideology
(Marxism, various schools of utopian and revolutionary socialism,
feminism, environmentalism, Afrocentrism, multiculturalism etc.) offers a
means of salvation and an eschaton (always a "revolution" of some kind,
in which the bad things are done away and the world is given a kind of
new birth) in which all wrongs are righted and all human problems and
challenges overcome.
Leftism then, is, in every sense of the term, a form of idolatry, and
its close approximation of religion, close enough to displace it from
both the mind and heart as the focus of one's convictions and priorities
in mortality, forges it as a strong competitor with the gospel as the
primary frame of reference and template through which we comprehend and
negotiate our mortal experience, including the many problems and
challenges of the political realm.
How compatible is each of these views of things - conservatism and leftism - with the restored gospel?
A discussion of that to follow shortly.
No comments:
Post a Comment